63
Overall Score /100
Wins 2 of 7 categories
59
Overall Score /100
Wins 2 of 7 categories
It's a tie 2–2
based on 7 categories of official U.S. government data
Chicago wins 2–2 overall (63/100)
💰 Chicago is more affordable
💼 Fort Lauderdale has lower unemployment
🛡️ Chicago has fewer disasters
📋 Chicago vs Fort Lauderdale — The Verdict
It's a close call — Chicago (63/100) and Fort Lauderdale (59.5/100) each win 2 categories. On affordability, Chicago has a clear edge with home prices 27% lower. For safety-conscious movers, Chicago has a notably lower disaster history with 8 fewer declarations in 20 years. Chicago may be the better fit for budget-conscious movers.
💡 Key Differences
🏠
Home prices in Chicago are 27% lower — a difference of $113,100 in median home value.
💰
Renting in Chicago saves you $313/month — that's $3,756 per year.
🛡️
Chicago has experienced 8 fewer federally declared disasters in the last 20 years, indicating lower overall natural disaster risk.
Median Home Value
$304,500
$417,600
Median Rent /mo
$1,314
$1,627
Median Income
$71,673
$75,376
The affordability gap is significant — Chicago offers home prices 27% lower than Fort Lauderdale, translating to $113,100 in savings on a median-priced home. This difference alone could determine which city makes financial sense for your situation.
Unemployment Rate
4.6%
4.3%
Job markets are essentially equivalent in both cities — the difference in unemployment rates is negligible. Focus on which city has more openings in your specific field.
Toxic Facilities (TRI)
0
0
Environmental conditions are broadly similar between the two cities based on current EPA monitoring data.
Max Internet Speed
N/A Mbps
N/A Mbps
Fiber Available
❌ No
❌ No
Solar Potential (kWh/m²/day)
Internet and utility infrastructure data helps assess remote work viability and monthly overhead costs in each city.
Disasters (20 years)
10
18
Chicago has a markedly lower disaster history — 8 fewer federal declarations over 20 years. This can translate to lower insurance premiums and less disruption to daily life.
❓ Moving from Chicago to Fort Lauderdale: Common Questions
Is Chicago or Fort Lauderdale cheaper to live in?
Chicago is more affordable overall. Home prices are $113,100 lower in Chicago. Monthly rent is $1,314 in Chicago vs $1,627 in Fort Lauderdale.
Does Chicago or Fort Lauderdale have better weather?
Chicago scores higher on climate (50/100 vs 40/100).
Is Chicago or Fort Lauderdale better for finding a job?
Fort Lauderdale currently has a stronger job market. Unemployment is 4.6% in Chicago vs 4.3% in Fort Lauderdale. Median household income is $71,673 in Chicago and $75,376 in Fort Lauderdale.
Which city is safer — Chicago or Fort Lauderdale?
In terms of natural disaster risk, Chicago is safer. Chicago has had 10 federal disaster declarations in 20 years vs 18 in Fort Lauderdale. Chicago scores 95/100 on safety vs 95/100 for Fort Lauderdale.
Should I move from Chicago to Fort Lauderdale?
Based on our data, Chicago scores 63.0/100 vs Fort Lauderdale's 59.5/100 overall. The best choice depends on your priorities — Chicago is more affordable, while Chicago has a better climate.
Planning to move from Chicago to Fort Lauderdale?
Compare quotes from top-rated moving companies and save up to 40%
Get Free Moving Quotes →
📊 Data: U.S. Census Bureau (ACS), Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS), NOAA Climate Normals,
EPA AirNow & TRI, NREL PVWatts, FEMA Disaster Declarations, FCC Broadband Data.
Last updated: April 5, 2026.